"For a long part of the history of modern medicine, the mention of credentialing and privileging a physician conjured images of paper stacks, rubber stamps, and file cabinets. Every couple of years, someone would make sure the new stack of papers were in order, stamp them, and add them to the file cabinet. The process often was perfunctory - frequently political - but infrequently rigorous. Those in a position to authorize (or reauthorize) a physician's appointment were reluctant to mount a challenge against a substandard candidate - a potential legal quagmire - and simply followed the path of least resistance. Every so often, the newspapers would chronicle patient tragedies linked to a clinician who should never have been practicing medicine. Hospital leaders would dismiss those as unavoidable circumstances: bad apples who cheated the system."
"Competition and the burgeoning patient safety movement now demand a different response from the entities that credential and privilege physicians."
So opens a document created by CRICO/RMF, the medical malpractice company owned by and serving the Harvard medical community, Credentialing, Privileging & Patient Safety.
The National Association Medical Staff Services, whose members are charged with verifying credentials and clinical competency for healthcare providers in hospitals, managed care panels, ambulatory surgery centers, nursing homes, etc. has long stated that "Patient Safety Begins With Us." Verifiers and administrators provide the foundation for a thorough credentialing and privileging program, but more is required. The system only works as intended if that foundation supports strong medical staff and business leadership; individuals who may at times need courage to navigate a difficult and treacherous course.
During the years that I worked in the field of medical staff administration in various organizations, more often than not I had reason to be proud of the leaders with whom I worked. They took their responsibilities seriously; they stood for the patient. On the few occasions when the path of least resistance was chosen over the safety of patients and the organization, I found it profoundly disappointing.
If you are charged with the responsiblity of assuring that only safe, competent clinicians care for patients in your organization, please remember that at this most crucial time in healthcare we need courageous leaders. Will you help guide us to safer waters?